Catégories
Planification Financière

Fiscal Drag: Why Earning More Does Not Always Mean Keeping More

Fiscal Drag: Why Earning More Does Not Always Mean Keeping More

“Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation” — Milton Friedman

3 min read

Fiscal Drag: Why Earning More Does Not Always Mean Keeping More

“Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation” — Milton Friedman

3 min read

Listen to this article

A pay increase is normally good news. However, a higher salary does not necessarily translate into an equivalent increase in the amount available for you to spend or save.

Inflation, tax thresholds, and progressive tax rates can all influence how much of an increase in income is ultimately retained.

One of the mechanisms behind this is known as fiscal drag.

What is fiscal drag?

Fiscal drag occurs when incomes rise faster than tax thresholds, resulting in a greater proportion of earnings becoming subject to tax or falling within higher tax bands.

The extent of fiscal drag depends largely on three factors:

  1. Tax thresholds and allowances 
  2. Inflation and rising living costs 
  3. Earnings growth relative to those thresholds

In some tax systems, thresholds are indexed or uprated, meaning they increase periodically in line with a measure such as inflation. This can help reduce the effects of fiscal drag. Where thresholds instead remain unchanged or ‘frozen’, their real value gradually falls as prices and earnings increase.

The overall proportion of income paid in tax can therefore increase without any change to headline tax rates. For this reason, fiscal drag is sometimes described as a ‘stealth tax’, as tax revenues can increase without rates formally being raised.

The role of inflation

When the cost of goods and services rises, wages will often increase over time as businesses seek to maintain employees’ purchasing power. However, a 5% increase in salary does not necessarily represent a 5% improvement in someone’s financial position.

If that higher nominal salary causes more income to become taxable or subject to a higher tax rate, disposable income may increase by considerably less than the headline pay increase. After allowing for higher living costs, real spending power could potentially decline.

This is also sometimes referred to as bracket creep, as rising nominal incomes gradually move taxpayers through a progressive tax system.

Does fiscal drag affect everyone equally?

The effect of fiscal drag can differ depending on an individual’s level of income:

  • For lower earners, an unchanged tax-free allowance represents a progressively smaller proportion of a rising salary, meaning more of their income becomes taxable. 
  • For middle and higher earners, rising salaries can push additional income across tax thresholds and into higher tax bands.

Research suggests that lower and middle earners can be particularly exposed, especially where their finances are more dependent on employment income.

For example, where wages are rising in response to inflation, the combination of higher living costs and a greater tax burden can mean that even after receiving a pay rise, real purchasing power may remain unchanged or potentially decline.

Conversely, those with higher incomes or greater accumulated wealth may have more diverse sources of income and capital, which can be subject to different allowances, rates and tax treatment depending on the jurisdiction.

They may also have greater flexibility over how and when income or capital is accessed, as well as greater scope to make use of pension contributions, tax-efficient investments and other available planning opportunities.

Two households experiencing similar growth in income or wealth may therefore face different outcomes depending on the source of that growth, how their finances are structured, and the allowances and planning opportunities available to them.

Why is it called fiscal ‘drag’?

Fiscal drag does not only affect an individual’s tax bill. The ‘drag’ refers to its potential effect on the wider economy.

As incomes rise, a greater share may be collected in tax, leaving households with less additional disposable income to spend. Across the economy, this can slow growth in consumer spending and reduce demand for goods and services.

For this reason, fiscal drag can act as an automatic stabiliser. During periods of strong economic and income growth, higher tax revenues can help moderate demand and reduce the risk of the economy overheating, without requiring an increase in headline tax rates.

What does this mean for financial planning?

A rising income is generally positive, but the headline figure only tells part of the story.

Changes in earnings can affect tax liabilities, disposable income, savings capacity and the value of available allowances. This can influence decisions around pension contributions, investment planning, retirement income and the timing of withdrawals from different assets.

Making effective use of available allowances, deductions, pension arrangements and other tax-efficient strategies can therefore form an important part of financial planning, depending on individual circumstances and the relevant tax jurisdiction.

At Patterson Mills, we consider these factors alongside your wider income, investments, pensions and long-term objectives to help structure your finances as efficiently as possible. 

If you would like to review how your wider financial arrangements could be structured more effectively, contactez-nous with us today and book your initial, no-cost and no-obligation meeting.

Send us an e-mail to contactus@pattersonmills.ch or call us direct at +41 21 801 36 84 and we shall be pleased to assist you.

Please note that all content within this article has been prepared for information purposes only. This article does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Always ensure you speak to a regulated Financial Adviser before making any financial decisions.

Catégories
Planification Financière

Swiss Unemployment – The 2022 Position

Swiss Unemployment – The 2022 Position

The primary solution to avoid technological unemployment is by investing in human capital

3 min read

The subject of “unemployment” has been a hot topic throughout the last couple of years. Public health measures caused many new people to appear on the unemployment register. However, are we coming out the other side of this artificial increase in unemployment?

An Endless Cycle?

Unemployment is clearly felt strongly by not only those unemployed, but it also adversely affects the economy as a whole.

The ripple effect caused by people suffering financial hardship, and all that comes with it, negatively impacts consumer spending (one of the key drivers of growth in an economy) which can lead to economic recession or even economic depression, if left to grow. Lower demand means lower profits for business which can lead to redundancies and, thus, more unemployment. It is a downward spiral that once started can be difficult to stop.

However, unemployment has more effects than just financial woes. People will face challenges with mental and physical health, there could be an increase in crime-rates, and Government spending on benefits could become out of control and also reduce GDP.

Reversing the trend!

It is not all doom and gloom though. A vital part of escaping a downward spiral is business and consumer confidence. If people are confident enough to be willing to invest in developing the right skills an economy needs, then both jobs and so productivity can rise again. It is certainly can be a long-term problem once it arrives, but the challenge for Government to try to keep productivity and economic development sustainable, suitable and strong enough for the local needs of the Country concerned.

Coming out the other side?

In Switzerland, the unemployment rate measures the number of people actively looking for a job as a percentage of the labour force.

Unemployment in Switzerland is, happily, on a falling trajectory fell to 2.4% in March, which is down from 2.5% in February and 2.6% in January. In numbers of people, this relates to 109,500 people registered with the regional unemployment office, 8,470 fewer than in February.

From a January 2020 level of around 2.6%, followed by a peak in January 2021 of 3.7%, it would seem that unemployment is now on a steady reduction and on its way back to pre-2020 levels.

Switzerland's 2022 figures compared to toehr leading Countries

Comparing these latest Swiss figures with those of other Countries, we see unemployment in the UK at 3.8%, France at 7.4%, Germany at 5.4%, the U.S at 3.6%, and Spain at a whopping 13.33%. So, it is clear that Switzerland is a front-runner in having some of the lowest unemployment figures in the World, which is possibly a reflection of its strength in markets and very modern approach to sustainability, positively impacting the economy, as well the levels of employment.

Getting your finances back on track

Financial planners have long held the responsibility to support their Clients as they face threats to their financial well-being, especially through and after periods of unemployment. At Patterson-Mills, we realise that with employment on the rise once more, we have an important role to play with getting people’s financial situation in order.

If you have recently become employed or had to change roles due to these turbulent times, we recommend taking advice to make sure your financial future remains on track.

Prenez contact dès aujourd'hui. Vous n'avez rien à perdre et potentiellement beaucoup à gagner!

Send us an e-mail to edward@pattersonmills.ch, call us direct at +41 78 214 84 32, or fill in our contact form below.

[fluentform id=”1″]

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Adresse électronique